pull down to refresh

Not at all. I research its limitations very often.

I tried it for coding but I wasn't convinced. It's good when I am not an expert in the programming language but far from better than me in my expertise (frontend).

Simple example, I asked it how many calories in a 5kg whole watermelon.

It will say a 100g portion has 30 calories. So it's a simple 50x30=1500 calories, it says.

Well what about the rind? I asked.

Then it realizes its mistake and does the correct math, but any nutritionist with a PhD level education wouldn't make that mistake. In fact most people who can still think for themselves wouldn't either. I love how people say it's because I am not prompting it right.

Sam Altman couldn't be more wrong about GPT5 being a PhD level expert on ANY given field.

Same mistakes happen in my field.

reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @gmd 5 Sep

well I'm in medicine ... LLM's are pretty damn good! lol

I also used to do software decades ago... I was pretty impressed how quickly I could vibe code a crappy game

reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @teremok 7 Sep

The devil is in the details. Crappy != good.

I shipped a videogame a while ago. Didn't sell that much but was praised by some big magazines

(Imagine, it was a time when video game mags were a thing)

After coding 100,000 lines of code I can safely say that good video games are by far some of the most complex software projects in the world.

reply

Thanks for sharing, it's helpful.

reply