pull down to refresh

440 sats \ 3 replies \ @Lumor 20h \ parent \ on: Bitcoin is about money, spam has no place in the timechain bitcoin
His idea is that users who make transactions start adding an extra output that goes to a 1 of N multisig that is addressed to spam-filtering miners. We bribe pools to filter spam in order for them to collect extra fees from such transactions instead of spam-transactions.
write
preview
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @SimpleStacker 19h
I think the part I didn't understand is: I didn't know that you can address transactions to specific miners or types of miners
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Lumor 19h
Yeah, I guess each miner/pool who wants these extra fees will have to disclose a public key. Then it's up to users to keep track of who is ellegible to be part of the multisig due to anti-spam compliance.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @standardcrypto 1m
Adam back wants to shift utxo bloat control (aka anti spam aka censorship) to users / wallets, who would subsidize miners who block spam.
Blocking spam sounds like a good thing. But can we really tell what is spam? Won't the jpegs just keep getting sneakier and sneakier. and it becomes a spy vs spy red queens race and opens a censorship attack vector to boot?
I agree utxo bloat is a problem but idk if this is a solution.
reply