Footnotes

1. Consider this from purely amoral measures... e.g., the question "Do parents prefer their kids watch Bitcon, Money Electric, or Hubble25?" has less to do with cinematic aesthetics and standards of documentary objectivity, and more to do with genre preferences and parental advisories. ↩
2. Note that all four combinations are possible, although obviously the fictional fantasies are more popular on both halves of the diagram. ↩
3. The closest label I can think of that is opposite to "Memoir" is "Scientific Correspondence", things like journal articles and (the Bourbaki corpus)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolas_Bourbaki#Works] that are written in first person plural and don't typically presume to tell a linear narrative (although some sections might be readable that way). Although books are frequentlny printed and bound containing nothing but this kind of writing [e.g. conference proceedings], they aren't usually found in book reviews, and the bulk of this "genre" is ideally retrospectively self-reviewing, through references and bibliographies. ↩
4. You could argue that "Young Adult" novels are categorisable as "children's books that are about glowing up", although some include adult themes so blatantly that they actually get censored. ↩
5. "Hard Scifi" is scientifically plausible fiction that takes no liberties with mechanics of how the world works; while there might be significant overlap between the audience of hard scifi and provisional patent applications, even comically unsophisticated perusal of the paragraphs [by neural networks either natural or artifical!] could tell the two apart. ↩