pull down to refresh
42 sats \ 7 replies \ @Coinsreporter 6 Sep \ parent \ on: SN is clumsy [and I'm worse] meta
Yeah the ceiling would be disappointing for most, still I think people would like SN more of put up as 'earning opportunity' before them. As you said we have enough lead (creators) we need more followers, but how? We need to show everyobe that SN is better than X and reddit on its 'contributor programme', it rewards more and it has the best community.
One thing that I've been surprised hasn't worked better is convincing more nostr users to just cross-post from SN. That seems like really low hanging fruit.
reply
Maybe we're just discussing about all of it in vain, there might just not be enough Bitcoiners who can make SN a community of a million people.
Maybe we first need to promote Bitcoin, SN will then be promoted automatically.
reply
I care more about the vibrancy of SN than the number of stackers.
Even just doubling our active users (assuming quality remains high) would make a huge difference.
reply
I can't agree more. I also think if our sleeping stackers rise again, it'd make a huge difference too.
reply
My view has pretty much always been that retaining contributors is better than attracting new ones. Unfortunately, we don't know much about how to do either
dashboards don't solve problems, people ignore information because tweaking dashboards will never be quite as satisfying as field stripping an open breech rifle
"look, you could have maxed your earnings by channeling your inner basic bitch at peak hours and honing your prose at night on lined 8.5x11" okboomer.glug
reply