Infinitesimal.
Using the definition at Investopedia, or this part of it:
"Liquidity refers to the efficiency or ease with which an asset or security can be converted into ready cash without affecting its market price. The most liquid asset of all is cash itself."
And the most important term, after "converted into ready cash" is "without affecting its market price."
By this definition bitcoin is woefully illiquid and transactions are afflicted with ruinous slippage. Hence all the distributed buying.
So, by this definition
Bitcoin liquidity is illusory.
But if cash is merely a widely recognised bearer asset that may only catalyse transactions, there are ways to make bitcoin appear even thus. The seven blind persons and the Elephant, all the way down.
And of course bitcoin must be sold. Or it won't be adopted. It's not the selling, it's the accepting of Bids that ruin bitcoins otherwise guaranteed existence and integrity. Holders Ask.
reply
Liquidity is a bit of a weird one, while bitcoin does have slippage it has no shortage of buyers and since its supply is limited the more buyers (people with the need to hedge against fiat) come in, the market becomes more "liquid" thats not to say prices can't rip up or down, theres always a bid at some price
Even deep liquid markets like forex have slippage and require open market operations, different central banks hold reserves of currency pairs to try and maintain certain ranges bitcoin doesn't have that, its repriced by the market which is why I think it looks so strange, we're just not used to seeing a market like that operate
reply
Bitcoin also possesses two uncommon features:
  1. Price insensitive buyers, DCA & transaction service users
  2. Zero demand response
Bitcoin relative to the pool of cash is small, from certain perspective though 10 times the size so is gold. But eventually the amount of cash required to shift the price of bitcoin will become large, and the growing number of holders who aren't expecting a narrow spread and take what bids they can find will learn to ask. Then we might see some smoothing.
reply
I agree with that, and
  • I would also add that it as a P2P market for every currency pair in the world
  • Its a bearer asset that can be lost
This isn't true for other assets
For sure trying to push value from cash and other assets into bitcoin isn't going to be a straight line, If I look at normie content they're still way off understanding it and allocate based on that understanding
reply
Let’s start with the basics—what makes an asset liquid or illiquid? Liquidity is used to describe how ready an entity is to spend. A highly liquid asset, then, would be one that is free to be used to cover expenses.
Portability and realisation are different issues, adjacent to liquidity, per below.
reply