pull down to refresh

Howzzat Cricket Lovers!
The round 1 of Cricket Pool (September 25) has just finished and it's time we have a look at the results of matches/pool questions and pool standings.
(This post is published after every round of the pool to give you all a clear idea where you stand in the pool and form your strategy for the next rounds.)
The Results (Round 1, September ) Predict the winners
  • South Africa
  • Afghanistan
  • Srilanka
  • No Result
Predict for Extra Runs Q.1. How many runs will Srilanka score against Zimbabwe? (+ - 30 runs will be considered correct)
  • 177 (147-207 is correct)
Q.2. How many runs will Bangladesh score against Netherlands? (+ - 30 runs will be considered correct)
  • 164 (134-194 is correct)

Pool Standings (Round 1, September 2025)

=

Pool Standings (Total Score - September 2025)

Good start. We have a Bingo but no 4 runs from anyone is disappointing. @TheMorningStar continues his good form, many of us getting 3 runs means we're in the same page, but we don't compete to be on the same. I think you gotta be bold if you wanna be more successful. @TheMorningStar boldly picked Afghanistan over Pakistan that paid him a Bingo and he's already 3 runs ahead!
Anyways, it's too early for the month but not for the year. If you miss here, someone else is gonna take your spot.
Best of Luck everyone! šŸ¤ž

Pool Prize (Breakdown)

  • For September : 10K Sats for the winner, 1k sats zap for the runner-up, 500 sats zap for the 3rd highest scorer.
  • For 2024-2025 Session (Annual Rewards: Distributed on Halloween 2025): 130000 Sats
Thanks for playing.
21 sats \ 7 replies \ @grayruby 15h
Alright decent start. Let's get some Jumbos now.
reply
Good luck! Not better than @undisciplined, how?
reply
We have a very large body of evidence demonstrating that I'm better at this than @grayruby (and only him).
reply
Suppose @Undisciplined beats @grayruby in 344 out of 673 contests. What is the p value of this outcome under the null hypothesis that they are equally skilled?
reply
30 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby 8h
0.258
reply
Dang! Not publishable
reply
We have hereby failed to reject the null hypothesis (at any publishable significance threshold) that @Undisciplined and @grayruby are equally skilled.12

Footnotes

  1. I did not actually check @grayruby's calculation ↩
  2. This is a mouthful, but it is the accurate way of saying it; but most high school teachers and medical professionals probably wouldn't know that.3 ↩
  3. Not a statistical claim ↩
reply
0 stars for you lol
reply