pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 15 replies \ @CliffBadger 18h \ parent \ on: If you were an authoritarian leader, what weird things would you do? AskSN
Nothing the government provides is free. They demand obedience in return.
Good government invests in the wealth creation potential of its territory and people.
Everyone wins.
Without good government people cannot enjoy the security and property rights essential to a healthy productive economy and society.
Without good government you have chaos and law of the jungle.
People who say they don't want taxes and government have never lived where there are neither- they really should go to experience the reality of their Libertarian wet dreams and see for themselves but they never do because that would be facing reality...and they would not last long without the security and wealth government provides.
reply
My friend, if my country adopted your model of good government I'd be dead in a week for thoughtcrime. I'll take my chances with the jungle.
reply
You cannot explain the reasoning behind this comment.
Because it is not based on logic, but misrepresentation.
At best hyperbole, at worst, trolling.
You do this because your ideology cannot be easily defended with reason.
reply
Where's the hyperbole? Do you think the PRC is "good government"? If I were a citizen, would I be allowed to say the CCP is infested with demons? Because if you don't think such basic self-expression should be permitted then I can't take seriously your claims about how an ideal society should look.
reply
Where did I say such self expression shouldn't be allowed?
That's blatant misrepresentation.
You are taking comments from other posts/threads about economic performance and dropping them out of context into this post which is about education- that's deliberate misrepresentation.
If I acknowledge Chinas economic performance in the context of the contest for global hegemony between China and the west I am not saying I agree with Chinas policies on freedom of speech. You seem to think/infer it is. You are completely wrong.
You are incapable of a sequential good faith contest of ideas and so repeatedly stoop to blatant and crude misrepresentation because your ideology is incapable of a good faith debate.
You are misusing and abusing freedom of speech in a manner that undermines the process of a good faith contest of ideas- you are thus undermining reason, good faith and democracy.
reply
Politics isn't separable from economics. You said property rights need government force for protection, so what does that good government look like?
reply
Economic performance can be exceptional where other aspects of politics, like freedom of speech can be very poor...so aspects of politics and economics can be quite separate.
Where there is wealth and security there tends to be greater freedom of speech or at least greater demand for freedom of speech, whereas in emerging/developing economies most people tend to prioritise economic development...for obvious reasons.
To have a thriving capitalist economy investors need to have both secure property rights and law and order, otherwise who would invest in an economy?
The subject of this thread however was education and whether or not it should ideally be free.
See if you can participate in good faith in a sequential reasoned debate, without wandering, randomly, far and wide, off the topic.
Note- The whole rationale/argument for freedom of speech is that it is fundamental to healthy free markets, science, and democracy- however this rationale depends on enough people using their freedom of speech in a constructive good faith manner - if people abuse and misuse freedom of speech they are undermining the very rationale/s upon which it is based.
reply
It's never free. It costs money to build the school and hire teachers. The question is whether the state should be taking money from some people to provide it free at point-of-use to others. The answer is no. What will happen is the state-funded schools will be trash, wealthier parents will go out of their way to pay for a superior education, the wealth gap will get even worse, socialists will use that to justify greater spending on failing schools, and it'll just be a never-ending cycle of violently chasing richer people's money, until eventually everything is owned by the state, everything is bad, and the only way anyone can afford something nice is by working for the state.