reply on: What does the sats under predyx market choices mean? \ stacker news ~Stacker

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @grayruby 16h \ parent \ on: What does the sats under predyx market choices mean? Stacker_Sports

Ok Colin Coward. I do think the Cardinals probably beat them next week with Brock, Kittle, Robinson and Aiyuk out. So you can laugh it up when the Cardinals are 3-0 atop the division and I will enjoy the last laugh after week 18.

40 sats \ 5 replies \ @HardMoney OP 16h

Yes. If the cards aren’t 3-0 after facing Rattler, Young, and Jones I might consider abandoning my fandom altogether

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @grayruby 16h

Mac looked sharp in camp and preseason. Not that that means anything. His issue is lack of mobility which isn't great considering the 49ers have a serviceable at best OLine.

Mac probably would have taken at least 5 sacks last week against the Seahawks

40 sats \ 3 replies \ @HardMoney OP 16h

I have pearsall in another league so hope he gets the target share Jones gave Brian Thomas Jr last year

My other team is actually pretty 49er heavy with Kittle and pearsall

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 16h

I currently have 11 49ers on fantasy team (includes D and the two guys on IR). Haha

I may have gone a little overboard but I picked up most of them for $1.

20 sats \ 1 reply \ @HardMoney OP 16h

It’s a guillotine league where the lowest scoring team is eliminated each week. Fun format. I went pearsall thinking he would have crazy target share initially with the injuries and suspension the other WRs have

Kittle looked awesome but his injury is unfortunate for that format.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 15h

Pearsall had a good game. Should have had a TD as well but Purdy didn't put enough on the ball and Woolen got a fingertip on it. I was wondering why Brock was throwing off his back foot so much in the second half. I thought it was just the Seattle pressure, which some of it probably was, but he likely couldn't step into throws like he normally would with the toe issue. Kind of explains the first INT and the missed TD but not the second INT that was just stupid.