pull down to refresh

Well, it sounds like population growth isn't what they thought it was going to be...
The total fertility rate in Bogotá, the capital of Colombia, is just 0.91 children per woman, lower than in Tokyo. India’s tfr has fallen below the level needed to keep its population stable in the long run. It is more-or-less bound to start shrinking around mid-century.
China’s population is already contracting. Mexico’s tfr stands at 1.6, about the same as that of its richer northern neighbour, the United States. In 2024 France recorded fewer births than in 1806, when the population was less than half its current size. Italy registered its lowest count since unification in 1861.
Population numbers she like they are particular full of momentum. Once they get headed in a direction, they really go in that direction.
What is striking and unexpected is that the decline in fertility is accelerating. The pace of global falls doubled between the 2000s and 2010s and has doubled again in this decade, sinking, on average, by almost 2% a year. In many places the fertility rate is dropping much faster.

What did people expect? Every message since the boomer generation has been: Don't have kids yet, if at all.

The lesson has clearly been taken to heart. It seems that most of the kids these days aren't having kids. But we all knew this thirty years ago.
But the big question is: are we doomed?

The last paragraph in this article is the most important: "Gee, we sure do get it wrong a lot."

“Replacement fertility is a knife-edge,” says Lant Pritchett of the London School of Economics. “Over the very long run, humans shrink to zero or swell to huge numbers, depending on whether they stay below or above the replacement rate.” The assumption that TFR must trend towards replacement is alluring, simply because “It makes the maths embarrassing if you don’t.” Alarmist predictions of a “population bomb”, which were trendy in the 1960s, may have made demographers hesitant to predict the opposite: that humanity will soon be shrinking. And yet, alarming or not, that will soon be happening.
Yes, predictions about individual behaviors generalized over a long time horizon often get it horribly wrong. But people react much more quickly to changes in society than you expect. My sense is that the roots to the reversal of the population decrease trend are already at work.

Don't give in to the doom and gloom, go make some babies instead.

this territory is moderated
112 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 4h
Sometimes I think is as good thing. This world is full of too many stupid people.
go make some babies instead.
The important thing is not quantity, but quality. If more stupid people will make more stupid kids (using shitGPT)... then we are not evolving... Make more kids but educate them well too.
reply
Feminism has been an effective way to reduce the population.
reply
123 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 12h
I think it must be environmental.
Likely also related to rise in transgender issues.
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @BeeRye 9h
children of men, except there is no mystery of why
reply
What's interesting is that the people who believe that we have no purpose other than to pass on our genes are the least likely to be passing on their genes
reply
As we step toward immortality, body quality will become more important than absolute numbers.
The mortals will die off and the immortals will be a new species.
reply