pull down to refresh
17 sats \ 10 replies \ @nout 9h \ parent \ on: Sunday Survey: Was Taproot a good thing for Bitcoin? bitcoin
Why not keep bitcoin in taproot addresses, what's the story there?
You'll have to ask a Taproot enjoooyer why they don't walk the walk... I can only speculate.
reply
reply
... Or even a material amount across all addresses total.
Proponents would seem to be either afraid of using it, or lied about their urgent use-cases all along.
On a purely relative basis, a proponents burden of proof is that they're no less "safe" than address types with a longer track record... But they won't put any skin in the game on their experiment.
reply
I guess I'm special. It's been quite long time since I last used anything onchain that's not taproot. The only non-taproot is when using lightning.
(just to highlight for other readers - Taproot is now 10% by output value and 20% by output count)
reply
Could go all-in with Taproot Channels... why the hesitation?
reply
reply
there's no actual prod solution yet
All my LN channels are STC (where is possible with the peer) from long time ago. And are perfectly fine.
Even chantools is supporting them now.
reply
LND has had them since v17
reply