reply on: Some important aspects for node runners \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 8 replies \ @_HUX13Y_ 15 Sep \ parent \ on: Some important aspects for node runners bitcoin

Does this mean that all Start9 nodes, which only run over Tor, are unreachable?

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 15 Sep

yes. All those doesn't matter for the network, are just personal nodes (virtue signaling).
Is like all those adding a flag to their twatter handle :)

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @_HUX13Y_ 15 Sep

Another point is whether the node is even connected to a wallet. Many Knots users have the machine running but havent connected to Sparrow so there havent been any transactions through the node and it is not an 'economic' node. Is that correct?

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin OP 15 Sep

That is another aspect that is not important/related in this debate. What they do with their own personal nodes is their problem.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @_HUX13Y_ 15 Sep

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @_HUX13Y_ 15 Sep

OK, interesting. That's a huge number of operators I imagine.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 15 Sep

Watching them how soon they will start complaining that their LN channels got rekt in FC.
Making popcorns... and waiting for the mess.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @_HUX13Y_ 15 Sep

FC?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 15 Sep

FC = force closed channel