pull down to refresh

Hi stackers,
With the "Creator Mode" now live at Predyx, we are seeing a big boost in the number of markets. Thanks to all of you 'stackers' making it already a grand success. We hope you all are enjoying the new feature.
From now, we'll be bringing in a regular post about Hot Markets on Predyx covering the markets that are going to be over within the next few days. For today, we are bringing in the markets for the weekend.
  • It is still wide open with none of the 6 odds exceed 21%. With only 36 hours left until the close, it's high time to saddle up before others ride away.
  • With odds highly favouring chiefs, it's a clear opportunity for the Giants fans. It's a sports market, it's highly unpredictable. Who knows!
  • Oklahoma is on high tide but but Auburn can be the sleeping giant rising on the right ocassion. Watch out!
  • It's setting up well slightly up in favour of Ravens. Can they fly or Lions catch them before the flight?
These are the hottest pick for the weekend aka. 'ending soon'.
Do you guys know that Predyx has an extensive filter that you can use to curate your market preference on the main page.
Did you ever use it? How did you like it?
If not please do, we'd love to know your experience on the filter to make any adjustments if needed.
Thank you in advance.
Predict.Stack.Win
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 20 Sep
Let’s go! Should be a fun weekend.
reply
Let's go, let's go.
How is your 'Filter' experience on Predyx?
reply
For the Auburn Oklahoma game, how was there 5.09k sats paid out to winners, but only one loser of 39 sats? Still trying to figure out the user interface, but shouldn’t the amount won equal the amount lost (minus fees)?
reply
That's where the initial liquidity comes into play + there may be some orders on 'No' but users sold them before the market close. In the end it was only one remaining user with 'No' shares.
reply
but users sold them before the market close
Who did these users sell the "No" shares to? Wouldn't whoever bought the "no" shares still have them, and be shown in the "losers" section? Or does it mean User X bought them, and User X also had "yes" shares, so they offset, and it reduced the number of "yes" shares user X was holding?
If so, would it be possible to show the amount of sats "lost" by users selling "no" shares at a loss (i.e. less than they bought them for). It feels like that is a missing piece of the closing metric.
reply