pull down to refresh

That's where the initial liquidity comes into play + there may be some orders on 'No' but users sold them before the market close. In the end it was only one remaining user with 'No' shares.
but users sold them before the market close
Who did these users sell the "No" shares to? Wouldn't whoever bought the "no" shares still have them, and be shown in the "losers" section? Or does it mean User X bought them, and User X also had "yes" shares, so they offset, and it reduced the number of "yes" shares user X was holding?
If so, would it be possible to show the amount of sats "lost" by users selling "no" shares at a loss (i.e. less than they bought them for). It feels like that is a missing piece of the closing metric.
reply