pull down to refresh

When I first started building Lightswap, the plan was simple: be the connective layer between the wallets, exchanges, and services people already use. Let users move their money, make sense of it, and act on it, all through natural language.
The vision was that Lightswap would be the connective tissue, the engine behind the scenes that makes money flow intelligently without exposing the technical rough edges.
For months, that felt right. Until one thought kept lingering: shouldn’t Lightswap have its own wallet? Some early adopters even assumed it would have a lightning wallet which pushed me to consider... should it have it's own wallet too?

The Question That Wouldn’t Go Away

At first, I ignored it. We already had enough to build: API integrations, data handling, interfaces. But every time I imagined the user experience, it felt incomplete.
We wanted users to be able to say, “Send 100k sats to Jack,” and have it just work. But when you rely on different third-party setups, you cannot guarentee a baseline experience.

The Pros and Cons I Had to Weigh:

The Benefits

It unlocks new capabilities. A built-in wallet transforms what Lightswap can do. It means users can send or receive sats directly through natural language, instantly, without juggling integrations or connecting anything first. It makes actions possible that simply weren’t before.
It guarantees a complete experience from day one. Users shouldn’t have to read setup guides or connect half a dozen accounts just to try something. With a wallet already built in, anyone can open Lightswap and immediately experience what it’s capable of. The first interaction already feels magical.
It creates one consistent way to pay. Without it, every user brings a different setup, on-chain wallets, exchange balances, hybrid mixes. That fragmentation hurts reliability and makes automation messy. A built-in Lightning wallet gives every user the same payment foundation, so everything just works the same way, every time.
Together, these make the case clear: if we want a seamless experience, we need to control it end-to-end.

The Challenges

It lengthens the build. Before, our focus was designing a great experience that played nicely with the ecosystem, integrating wallets and exchanges that already exist. Now, we need to roll up our sleeves and build one ourselves. That’s no small task.
It adds complexity. Lightswap has always aimed to feel simple. Adding a Lightning wallet introduces another layer to design, maintain, and secure. Complexity isn’t automatically bad, but it is an amber flag — one that deserves a hard look.
That’s a big shift. And it’s not one to take lightly. Complexity can slow you down. It can break your focus. So we spent time questioning it. Do we really need this? Are we sure it’s worth it?
Every time, the answer came back the same: yes. Because to deliver the experience we imagined - one that feels powerful and intuitive from the moment you start - we have to control that layer.

The Call

So we’re doing it. Lightswap will ship with a built-in Lightning wallet!
It’s more ambitious, but it makes the product stronger. It ensures that from day one, anyone using Lightswap can experience the power of bitcoin - instantly, naturally, and without friction.
It’s a step forward that brings us closer to the vision: making money talk.
Let’s build!
If you’re as excited about making bitcoin feel simple and powerful as I am, I’d love your thoughts. How would you want to use a built-in Lightning wallet? What should it make possible? Drop a comment below — let’s build the future of bitcoin UX together.

If you're new to Lightswap...

We’re building an app that lets you move bitcoin and fiat across your existing wallets, exchanges and bank accounts — using natural language, you just type it out! It makes moving and managing money much easier and much quicker. It already works with major exchanges, so you can buy, sell, send, query, automate DCA, and build workflows without leaving the conversation. We’re opening a 100-person beta and I’d love to get early feedback from bitcoiners here.
174 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 9h
Non-custodial? Custodial? Trustodial?
reply
We’re exploring a non-custodial setup with managed node operations.
Users hold their own keys. The underlying infrastructure (like Greenlight) simply handles the node management and reliability side.
In short: you control your funds, we make it work smoothly behind the scenes.
reply
That'd be just another trustodial mobile wallet, greenlight doesn't solve trust or issues of mobile offline-ness since there's still bi-direction with the remote signer (phone)... it's just a gimmick to scam the regulator... not a solution.
You're also still going to need integrations to other apps/services to get utility out of it... and that utility isn't going to improve by being just another trustodial wallet that can't help people actually earn sats.
I do like the idea of a language based interface, I've tinkered with it myself as that's really the killer app of "AI" in my view #1017929... but time is scarce...
Would be interested to collaborate if you back the wallet with Lightning.Pub, our wallet client is already bundled into a proto. A language interface over its RPC would be a great pairing given its powers.
reply
Will you build this from scratch or fork a project?
reply
The moment you make it possible for a user to send and receive sats immediately inside the app without setup barriers you change the mental model from “this is an app I need to configure to “this is the app I use to move money instantly” That shift has a huge impact on retention and growth...
My only caution is to ensure the embedded wallet does not become a silo. If you can keep it interoperable and flexible while still offering the baseline experience you described you will preserve the connective tissue vision that Lightswap started with. Your differentiator is natural language control of money flow across different platforms and the wallet should amplify that rather than replace it..
reply