So, I gave some thought to the topic (as in the title) and this is what I came up with.
For disclosure, I am an atheist, a libertarian and (obviously) a Bitcoiner - which, I understand is a relatively rare combination since conservatives usually follow their faith. But the core point is simple, and that seems to carry over from the creationism vs Darwinism debate, i.e.
The allegiance to and illusion of design.
A part of humans feeling safe in this grand, largely inhospitable universe, for their fleeting lifespan of like ~75 years, is the faith, or belief that the whole thing is being somehow controlled or managed by some conscious being motivated by similar emotional instincts as ourselves. Hence, the need for faith, in that being, rather than faith in purely the laws of physics (which are hopelessly impersonal and devoid of any feelings). And, part of that grand design, is the animal/plant kingdom.
But if you read the The Blind Watchmaker, you will see how the author deconstructs the whole argument, to establish that no design needed indeed, and evolution over the ages is perfectly capable of establishing today's biodiversity.
Does not the same feeling carry over when it comes to thinking of money and the role of central bankers? God like creatures (with their Harvard PhDs and Nobel) who know perfectly well how to design the monetary system and apply data driven tweaks, setting the correct interest rate and amount of liquidity?
For the average morons, is the biggest challenge in understanding Bitcoin as money coming from this blind obsession with design and the underlying belief that in the absence of this design, the whole economy would somehow apart?