pull down to refresh

@supertestnet making this list because he talked to 3 different people recently who plan to remain on Bitcoin Core due to their impression that a "consensus of the devs" favors relaxing the op_return filters, and that only a handful of technical people dispute this consensus. He wants to show that there is no such consensus.
By "technical people" he mean people who write or review code for protocols and apps that are (1) bitcoin itself (2) "on" bitcoin (e.g. wallets) (3) bitcoin adjacent (e.g. Liquid)
123 sats \ 17 replies \ @optimism 4h
It's... configurable? What other 30.0 feature is controversial that is not configurable? txorphanage?
All this drama because Szabo came back or his acct got hacked?
reply
211 sats \ 12 replies \ @Scoresby 4h
My guess is it's him. He joined the board of Jan3 in January and his tweets have largely followed the line of Excellion.
Also Szabo's recent immigration takes seem to align with his pre 2021 takes.
reply
102 sats \ 10 replies \ @optimism 4h
I'm agnostic to him coming back or his account getting hacked.
#noheroes
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 4h
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 4h
Exactly!!!
reply
Oh right now you are “slaying your heroes” because Nick won’t go along with your change?
Wow the cognitive dissonance is unbelievable
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 45m
good friend, I challenge you to find the instance where I said anyone working on Core was my hero, or where I acted like Core developers deserve any special credence because of who they are.
I do believe they deserve credence because of their past work, just as I think Szabo is worth listening to because of his past work.
reply
What previous work exactly?
The inflation bug? Taproot witness exploit?
reply
My heroes? Nope. My change? Nope. Also I'm not achow.
reply
You are supporting v30 so yes it is your change brother
reply
It must suck to so desperately need a tree to bark up on, that you have to resort to this tree. lol
I'm supporting code review. Have you done code review, brother? Have you at the very least read the release notes? What's the non-configurable change and how is it controversial?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @sudonaka 13m
Make sure you mention all that to the jury for the cp distribution trial, I’m sure they will understand.
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 3h
LOL now all make sense
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @sudonaka 52m
None of you "technical" geniuses have explained what exactly is preventing this exact same thing from happening to bitcoin just like it did on BSV with the same code. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47130268
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 41m
Nothing is.
reply
How's Szabo related to all this drama?
111 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b 5h
Bitcoin Mechanic
I could've swore dude is nontechnical.
reply
He is in the mining side.
reply
169 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 5h
I know he works for a company that does technical things, but it's disingenuous to call him technical.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 5h
I mean... a mechanic is technical right? Right? lol
reply
lol
reply
bitcoin or gold?
reply
111 sats \ 3 replies \ @kepford 4h
This may be a dumb question but I'm gonna ask it.
Consensus of what devs? Are people thinking there is consensus of core devs or just devs that build bitcoin ecosystem tools?
reply
No, it's a very smart question, actually. And I don't know the answer. I'd personally not call this shitshow "consensus", but then, who cares? You can still configure it in any way you like.
reply
People care if they care about Bitcoin.
Bitcoin-core being corrupt or compromised is a pretty big deal
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 2h
Indeed...
reply
I don't really like this kind of appeal to authority. The arguments should stand on their own. Yes, being experienced with the technical side gives you some more weight on technical matters, but Bitcoin is more than just a technical system. There are all sorts of incentives and game theory that matter as well, which is not traditionally the realm of programmers (which is what is typically meant by technical).
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 2h
Engineers OFTEN have bad ideas. This is why the vast majority of apps/projects fail. Their code might be great but the idea is bad.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 2h
I don't really like this kind of appeal to authority. The arguments should stand on their own.
Indeed
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 5h
He wants to show that there is no such consensus
Yeah, when consensus is used as a tool to shut up debate... that's no good.
Also no good is bad arguments that are hyperbolic. I've seen way too much of that in this debate.
reply
It's missing Nick Szabo
reply
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.
deleted by author