pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 24 Oct \ parent \ on: The socialist housing plan for New York City econ
You will find such a compelling argument here-
#1261402
Looking forward to your response.
Silence???
Silence???
StackerNews is for high quality conversation, not whatever low effort you're engaging in. I asked you if you've read Hayek and you ignored the question. I also raised the most central issue I see with ignoring the warnings from Hayek and you ignored that as well. I can't be bothered continuing this low effort conversation as it's not giving me or anyone else anything of value.
reply
As always you demand I respond to your references and terms but you completely ignore the facts and issues I raise.
High quality reasoned debate indeed!/s
You specifically asked for 'a compelling argument how Hayek is wrong' and I have responded to that challenge and directed you toward exactly such an argument- one located on this platform where can enjoy the full rights and privileges of an in context reply - but you have not responded to it.
Low quality, hypocrit.
reply