pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 4 replies \ @zapsammy 24 Oct \ on: A Stoic Resurrection: Notes from the Journal of a Modern Stoic BooksAndArticles
cool collection of digitized thoughts!
a few observations:
this term u wrote: "cosmic ménage à trois" pertaining to "sensitivity, creativity and femininity." i cannot agree, because for me, the cosmic trinity are Thoughts, Emotions, and Actions, in that order; it is the e-Motion that u may be relating to, the divine feminine that gets imbued with the thoughts and gives birth to the Action or "Aton," the light rays of creation;
regarding the section on Suffering - the etymology of the word to suffer is roughly "to continue let happen;" people misinterpret this idea, or interpret it in a dark context; as far as i am concerned, most suffering is unacceptable, except that which i impose on myself as a sacrifice to continue the Great Work; u do mention this aspect of suffering, however, i think this write-up wud be even better if u defined ur terms in the appendix upfront;
for example, "For there to be harmony there has to be a movement, a frequency" is common sense, if u were to include the fact that harmonics is related to music;
there are quite a few thought-provoking codes u wrote!
Hey, thanks for reading & for your observations!
Regarding the cosmic trinity, yeah, my take is more from the thoughts and emotions side, with action stemming from them later.
Interesting point about the etymology of suffering! But it is also the case that we can't control many things in our surroundings (and even within ourselves in some cases) so some of it just is, and as such, has to be accepted. At the core, I think this is the gist of it:
"Suffering exists either way, I think. Love is what gives it meaning, a reason, makes it bearable. If there is love, you can transcend suffering."
Regarding definitions, yeah it may be a good idea, but at the same time, I kind of like some of the ambiguity and the fact that every person can read those passages from their own vantage point, according to their own definitions. Besides, I'm not sure how great I would be at definitions - meanings of words depend on their particular contexts...
reply
No; words have resonance and carry power; the ancients knew the power of words when certain vowels and consonants are combined! thus, the original meaning from Latin & Greek and even paleo-hebrew is the closest correct interpretation of the sounds;
watch Language of Creation for clarification;
modern language controllers make people believe that u can attach any meaning to any word depending on the context; be very careful how u wish ur message to be interpreted;
in a world where Anarchy (an-archony = no ruler) no longer means Freedom, everyone who believes otherwise is probably an enemy;
reply
Ohh I'm definitely going to watch Language of Creation! Words, sounds and meanings are something I'm always interested in (my artist name is no coincidence!). Again, many thanks for the recommendation.
reply