pull down to refresh

Are pink shells breaking the "law"?
I think this is a wrong question. Here is the question people should ask:
I've said it many times, but people still ignore the elephant in the room issue:
There's NO LAW that can stop me to trade freely with whatever I want to consider it money. The govs laws refers to their fiat money (aka legal tender), not to Bitcoin or any way of using Bitcoin. And legal tender is totally another story than money and Bitcoin.
Or let's put it more simple:
112 sats \ 7 replies \ @ek OP 22h
Have you told Ross Ulbricht that he could have saved 12 years of his life in prison if he just told the judges they have no authority over him?
reply
His biggest mistake was to trust the lawyers and the "judicial" system. He was railroaded and he didn't know how to defend himself.
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek OP 22h
So you didn’t? Why not?
I would love to see his reply.
reply
We are deviating from the subject now, but anyway. I've said it multiple times: Ross was used as a patsy from day 1, even that he didn't know it. They wanted to make an example of him to hit hard on Bitcoin.
And now, being a "presidential" puppy, he could not say anything about the real story. He's silenced for life, but "free".
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 22h
So if I’m a patsy, I can’t claim they have no authority over me even though I don’t even know about it? 🤔
reply
Practically yes, if you are railroaded and cornered, your only option is to defend:
reply
if he just sent the judges your blog
That's stupid. You have to learn by yourself and study about how to defend yourself, not just copy pasta and/or pointing to others words.
One thing is to talk about this stuff online and another thing is to prepare yourself, in private.
reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek OP 22h
I edited my reply before you replied and changed it to this:
if he just told the judges they have no authority over him
But I guess you didn’t see it before you replied
reply