pull down to refresh

123 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 14h \ parent \ on: Phoenix 2.7.0 - Taproot channels! lightning
presumably ACINQ runs a node that has both these taproot channels and normal channels?
Yes, private channels are a consensus of two. The spec for public channels (ie channels wanting to be included in the network graph) does not support taproot channels yet afaik.
So a taproot channel wouldn't be a separate network any more than any other channel on its own is?
A private taproot channel wouldn't be a separate network any more than any other private channel on its own is. A private channel is like a network of size two, so it is a separate network in a sense.
Public channels which are included in the network graph and can carry payments for other nodes (be routed across) are expected to have non-taproot channels currently.
write
preview
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 13h
this is super helpful! thanks.
reply