pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @beyond_turbulence 11 Nov \ on: The False Light: How “Family Values” Became a Mask for Racial Preservation Christianity
Thanks ! Subgratance ? #1272710
The Sanctuary Coup
History’s oldest hustle: not a limp **** pimp?
When fear ain’t in this house trades prophecy for power —and power always trades back a corpse, death and gold.
The playbook:
Take an ideology — fear, control, purity.
Rebrand it — “family values,” “heritage,” “safety.”
Baptize it, sacrifice it in holy water, and call it divine strategy.
The church’s favorite metaprogram:
Away: “We’re under attack!” (fear).
Towards: “Preserve what’s ours.” (control).
Outcome (attache): The Kingdom traded for a fortress.
The compass? Still points toward “radical love” — borderless evil, reckless purity, freedom masquerading as liberty.
The judgment? An internal alchemical process of transformation ! Call fear by name, in a cartoon voice! Call out capitulation!
This isn’t faith anymore— it’s a panic attack from an Apache or Anasazi with liturgical precision like a watcher or witness or thrice ... Hard or soft politics ?
Every altar of organizational power is a mirage like a 501(c)(3) license or permit .
Every real God still wanders the wilderness like an alligator with no chance of compromise —untamed like a jaguar, unbranded like a Mexican grey wolf, unbought like mountain lion wandering around the gates!
⸻
"Take an ideology — fear, control, purity.
Rebrand it — “family values,” “heritage,” “safety.”
I fail to see the connection between these clearly.
family values= mother/father, not to be redefined with any gender narrative.
Heritage= haven't heard this one, but spiritual heritage makes sense. guard the faith. ------------"hold fast to that which you first believed"
Safety= Secure your family and your faith.
I can understand fear and control, those actually go together. But purity? What's the rebrand of purity?
reply
The Pioneer Fund’s idea of “purity” originally meant racial purity: keeping America’s bloodline white.
Over the decades, that language was rebranded inside the New Right as “moral purity,” “family values,” and “protecting heritage.”
It’s the same underlying instinct to preserve a certain kind of American identity, just rewritten in spiritual terms.
reply
It's not the same. It's using the same word with entirely different meanings. Preserving the American values of liberty and human freedom are worth defending. Those get confused with things like patriotism, which gets defined as support for the military and empire.
reply
I hear you pushing back on the connection, and that’s the exact challenge: the rebranding works because the new terms sound unobjectionable.
No one announces ‘we’re preserving racial hierarchy.’ They say ‘we’re protecting family values’ or ‘defending our heritage.’ The ideology gets laundered through respectable-sounding language.
My point isn’t to adjudicate which version of ‘American values’ is correct. It’s to document how a specific ideological project—traceable through organizations, funding, and messaging—has moved from explicit racial language to coded cultural language, and how that shows up in religious spaces.
The gospel is ‘come as you are.’ But when churches start preaching that demographic change is spiritual warfare, we’re seeing that pipeline at work.
reply
I think when you have coordinated programs running thru the UN, Soros funded groups, USAID, Catholic Charities, and Lutheran Social Services, doing human trafficking then I think it's fair to call that spiritual warfare. They are doing this to overthrow the western countries and their values.
What makes you think that when they say "family values" the don't just simply mean family values? The democrat party and the leftist orgs are clearly trying to undermine families don't you agree?
reply
No. I’ll leave this part of the conversation with this:
When it comes to the church of YHWH Saves, the Messiah, the Anointed One, I’m reminded that our struggle is not against flesh and blood, or any of the groups people try to turn into enemies.
I’ve written more here for anyone who wants the deeper context:
#1261531
I appreciate your thoughts and your engagement in good faith.
God speed.
reply