pull down to refresh

NAKA- Look out below- @denlillaapan was right
488 sats \ 32 comments \ @grayruby 23h Stacker_Stocks
write
preview
related posts
61 sats \ 10 replies \ @BlokchainB 22h
NAKA WILL SURVIVE!!
ADDING MOAR SHARES
Call yourselves Bitcoiners laser focused on the fiat price?
Just a friendly reminder NAKA owns more Bitcoin than all the stackers combined.
I will dump shares soon as their Bitcoin balance is zero.
That is the only metric that matters.
reply
72 sats \ 5 replies \ @denlillaapan 21h
no it won't, bro. It'll die soooo goddamn hard.
next: https://beta.predyx.com/market/will-naka-the-bitcoin-treasury-acquisition-company-experience-a-major-corporate-downfall-by-december-31-2026-2359-utc-1763449249
reply
146 sats \ 3 replies \ @south_korea_ln 15h
I just checked about ending the market earlier, as you said you don't like locking your coins for more than 12 months. Seems like it is possible.
As you're the only yes vote for now, I feel like you're the only one that would be negatively impacted by an earlier closing date.
Would you be okay with me setting the close date to say 5 months from now, at the end of April 2026? Or any other date?
reply
93 sats \ 2 replies \ @denlillaapan 8h
Sure, that's reasonable
reply
62 sats \ 1 reply \ @south_korea_ln 8h
Done. @Mega_Predyx, @mega_dreamer, could you edit the title of the market to remove the mention of 31st of December, 2026. I've already modified the actual ending date, but the title cannot be edited anymore.
reply
68 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 4h
I'm not getting paid out either, buuuhuu. Predyx team buzy af, it seems
#1287488
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 15h
Don’t make me have to take your Sats haaha
reply
101 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 20h
but as a shareholder you're last in line to see any of that bitcoin. I think even employees are entitled to compensation before shareholders.
reply
67 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 15h
This is sarcasm right?
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby OP 22h
Not if they exchange all that Bitcoin for equity in other companies.
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 22h
Still a far cry from the 5k they hold. They are looking for growth so it may workout it may not. But as a shareholder I’m not mad at this strategy
reply
40 sats \ 8 replies \ @Coinsreporter 22h
What is it about then?
reply
331 sats \ 5 replies \ @grayruby OP 22h
They moved some Bitcoin so people said they sold but he claims that was to make investments in other treasury companies. Who knows. Everything is a mess right now. Japan bond market is blowing out. VIX is spiking. There is no liquidity. There is really no accurate picture of the US economic situation because of the government shutdown. Just stack some cheap sats and wait for it to all blow over. They aren't going to let the market collapse. Eventually they will print a ton of money to prop it up.
reply
46 sats \ 2 replies \ @denlillaapan 21h
They moved some Bitcoin so people said they sold but he claims that was to make investments in other treasury companies. Who knows. Everything is a mess right now.
"moved" some bitcoin -.- Check the SEC filings for yourself, literally said "sold" and they realized losses for it.
You can try to weasel out of that if you wish, but them's the facts
reply
14 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby OP 20h
I am just conveying what David Bailey said. I am not trying to weasel out of anything. I don’t have a dog in this fight.
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 20h
sorry! Didn't mean you, you... just the general "a person" (in this case Mr. B, but whatevs)
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 18h
Exactly.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 22h
This is exactly what’s happening!!
reply
40 sats \ 1 reply \ @denlillaapan 21h
nonsense gaslighting/narrative control
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby OP 20h
Just playing devils advocate, from a GAAP accounting perspective they may be required to recognize the transfer of bitcoin to another entity as a sale considering Bitcoin is an asset on the balance sheet not cash.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 18h
wen settled, @mega_dreamer? (me wants payout on the biggest contract I ever had!)
reply
40 sats \ 4 replies \ @Scoresby 23h
not looking pretty.
reply
10 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby OP 22h
I have to be honest. MSTR is actually starting to look kind of interesting for the first time in a couple years.
reply
40 sats \ 2 replies \ @Wumbo 22h
https://www.strategy.com/
mNAV 1.18
I wonder if it will get under 1 in the near future.
reply
78 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby OP 22h
I think sub 1.2 starts to become compelling at least for a trade. I could see it testing 1.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Wumbo 22h
In additional to mNav metric.
I think total yearly dividend payments (expense) is a number I want to find a metric for.
Is Strategy spending 500 million, 1 billion, 5 billion, etc... each year in dividends?
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jer 18h
Oopsies
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 21h
I knooooooow... I just wish I had more guts/better foresight. Was kind of worried it wouldn't happen on that short a deadline ("before black friday").
Also, "Feather" rugged me... YOLOed 25k just as I was adding to my position
I was literally sitting around and watching as it hovered (and bounced 2-3 times) off $0.50
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @BITC0IN 22h
lol
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @janetyellen 50m
DAVID BAILEY IS NOT ONLY A SHITCOINER BUT ALSO A FAGGOT RUNNING A PUMP AND DUMP SCAM
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby OP 1m
Janet, we need you back. The money printer just isn't the same without you.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 20h
its all irrelevant. China has won the trade war and all wealth derives ulimately from trade...not financialisation.
reply