The default mempool size is 300 MB. Transactions that were dropped can still be rebroadcast later. Nodes don’t usually go offline from having a full mempool, because the mempool limit is so small.
Either of the two may increase the minimum feerate for getting into the next block and price out less valuable transactions. Both filling the mempool or submitting a transaction with an inscription to the network are just ways to bid on blockspace. It seems to me that both Inscriptions and low-value transactions will be priced out in the long run, but while demand for blockspace is low, it follows that it’s cheap to acquire the undemanded blockspace. There isn’t much that one can do against it except to make more competitive bids for the blockspace.—If someone wants to make sure that the blockspace gets utilized fully, they just need to ensure that there is always another transaction bidding for blockspace at the minimum feerate.
I'm impressed by your fairly reasonable take, when I saw that you replied I honestly expected you to roast me or imply that I'm debating in bad faith with the examples I'm presenting.
However, it's concerning to me that there are still devs and influencers who are trying to police the way that others use their own bitcoin.
The fact that we still refer to it as "permissionless", advocate for building a market for block space and suggest that "Bitcoin is for enemies" while we agree that some legitimate use cases that the network enables are attacks or spam is one sweet piece of irony. These people have no issue still calling themselves libertarians.
reply
Thanks. Yes, the irony of the “not-in-my-blockchain” folk was not lost on me either.
reply
The fact that we still refer to it as "permissionless", advocate for building a market for block space and suggest that "Bitcoin is for enemies" while we agree that some legitimate use cases that the network enables are attacks or spam is one sweet piece of irony.
Well said, couldn't agree more.
reply