pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @kevkevin OP 3h \ parent \ on: op_ctv still has no technical objections bitcoin
In your opinion what is a mission critical problem that you would like to see addressed with or without an op code?
Ik you mentioned utxo ownership as one of your concerns before.
None imminently critical.
utxo ownership as one of your concerns
Distribution is a concern, obviously more distributed is better, but that's a market/econ function not a technical one. Reality is most of the world doesn't have any money to save at all, and the relatively few people with a lot of money to save can buy an out-sized share of Bitcoin, which compounds the problem of distribution because Bitcoin is so scarce. Every wealthy person that buys Bitcoin makes it more expensive for someone with no money that doesn't have any.
Distribution relative to scarcity also creates price risk for early adopters, any purchasing power above Saylor's cost basis is less reliable than it would be were those coins more distributed.
Not a concern, but a reality, is that distribution is only technically limited by supply. That is a recognition that trust and centralization are necessary for "scale" to a mythical cohort of users, but does not imbue the notion that trust and centralization must be accommodated in Bitcoin itself, as trust and centrality are external systems.
reply