pull down to refresh

The four major scientific publishers — Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, and Taylor & Francis — earned more than $7 billion in 2024, with profit margins unimaginable in almost any other industry, exceeding 30%, according to a new analysis led by British anthropologist Dan Brockington of the Autonomous University of Barcelona. This collective windfall is explained by the “publish or perish” system — which rewards improbably prolific scientists who produce a study every two days — as well as a shift in the industry’s business model. Previously, readers paid subscription fees to access quality journals. Now, amid the push for open access to science, it is the authors themselves who must pay to have their research published so that others can read it for free. This perverse incentive — whereby both scientists and journals earn more the more they publish, regardless of quality — has fueled a flood of millions of low-quality studies.
Elsevier is the publisher that publishes the most studies and earns the most, with a 38% profit margin ($1.5 billion in 2024), according to the analysis by Brockington and his colleagues.
38%!!!
The free market really loves public money...
Interesting. I still haven't paid to publish anything, but then again my last publication was in 2023. I would be surprised if the prestige journals did this though, I think a lot of the top academics who publish there would feel undignified. Is it because of the expansion of pay to publish arms of prestige journals, like Nature Technical Reports that you told me about?
reply
That's a reasonable guess. But don't have numbers to back it up or counter it.
So the readers of your papers need to pay to read you? Through university subscriptions?
Or open access publishing is standard in econ?
reply
i imagine most people who read my work would access it through their institutional subscriptions.
i usually post my working papers on SSRN as well, which by the time the project is over will mirror the published version pretty much 1:1, minus journal-specific formatting
reply
Preprint servers are a gift to humanity. Luckily they've become powerful enough that these days journals cannot forbid you to share your published work on arXiv and the likes, minus formatting.
reply
I think we all know the incentives are really screwed up, but the alternative would probably require doing demonstrably useful research, which is an even scarier prospect.
Maybe you can't relate, since you're in the tiny minority that already does useful research.
reply
The thing is that every scientist believes they are doing useful research~~
reply
I think the fear is that no one else thinks it's useful
reply
Thats fucking crazy 😤
reply
It is.
I happily rejected an Elsevier request to referee for free for one of their journals last month.
reply
is it Elsevier that requests you, or the journal editor? i sometimes feel like i can't turn down certain editors.
reply
Editor. Bad phrasing, sorry.
It's easy to turn down Elsevier journals as i usually don't publish with them.
reply