pull down to refresh
102 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 8h \ parent \ on: Bitcoin Beginner Saloon #2 bitcoin_beginners
Not many territories are profitable; that's why there's churn. It's a net cost for me too.
So what I really like in the recent change is that downzaps no longer go for 70% to the territory, but fully to rewards. This takes away an incentive for the territory to have bad content (because bad content would before generate relatively high income) It also redistributes sats to those that wrote good content - for their trouble of being confronted with the bad content?
I agree with pay-to-post > post-to-earn.
Is really hard to think how to re-distribute downzaps.
We want them to be like a punishment / slap on the face / warning but if we give back the sats to a pool, the same zaps are redistributed to the same user that was downzapped in the first place, even that is in a small portion.
Is really a complicated situation for k00b / SN.
I personally do not downzap too much, I do it more as a personal "mark" of users, with small amounts, only few times with higher amounts. Because I know is kind of useless. Once I mark a user with a downzap, it remain forever for my own judgement. Then before I will interact again with that user, first thing I look into his history and if I see a single downzap, I know with who am I talking too... I have no remorse.
Most of stackers here are zapping without looking into others history... just instinctively zapping... and is a waste.
reply