pull down to refresh
related posts
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 14 Feb 2023
This article is so bad on so many levels. For starters, has the author not heard of the US war on staking, the Howie test, the inability to unstake staked ether, the lack of security on the ethereum blockchain after switching to POS. Speaking of POS, that's what this article is.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 14 Feb 2023
Have fun getting rekt.
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @mallardshead 14 Feb 2023
LOL. Miner revenue has been getting cut in half every four years since 2009. According to this article, it's something to be concerned about this time. It then goes on to misnomer things and promote a plutocratic directionally centralizing consensus mechanism. Ethereum has unfixed monetary policy and a variable price. That excludes it from ever being money, its consensus excludes it from decentralization, and on and on.
Capital: concentrated
Energy: distributed
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryptocoin 15 Feb 2023
This [garbage] article's source is on CoinDesk (of course):
Why Bitcoin Miners Need to Take Ethereum Seriously
https://www.coindesk.com/consensus-magazine/2023/02/14/why-bitcoin-miners-need-to-take-ethereum-seriously [Archive]
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryptocoin 14 Feb 2023
Short it down to ZERO!!!
reply