pull down to refresh
Yeah, I’m very aware of your three-level stash, since I’ve been following your “be your own bank” guide.
That’s actually why I think going Taproot only makes sense, letting the hodl, cache, and spending wallets all look the same on-chain, at least from an external observer’s view.
And yet you @DarthCoin refuse to enable sats MoE on Stacker News.
You have deliberately disabled BTC MoE on Stacker News yet claim yourself to be living on The Bitcoin Standard.
Lying arsemilking Hypocrit.
I’m tired of this ss - you are neither channeling Solomon or Satoshi with this shit. Darth can do whatever he damn well pleases. That is the nature of Bitcoin. Opt-in system. If Bitcoin required trolls to boost onchain txs (or whatever you consider MoE), it has failed. I appreciate your enthusiasm, but you are trying to bully people into your world view. What kind of opt-in economic nonsense is this!
Stop preaching your flavor of MoE. I don’t give a fuck what darth does with his account wallet bindings or coins, the guy has dedicated years to trying to advance the field, and you have been giving him grief for months about some damn trollboard sats.
Where @DarthCoin preaches about how he lives on the bitcoin standard but where he in reality refuses to engage with and participate in SNs BTC enabled circular economy I will point out this fucking massive HYPOCRISY.
Why is it hypocrisy? Is every Bitcoiner required to use SN, and tip each other sats via a centralized message board?
Is the MoE of Bitcoin influenced in the slightest by a handful of LN txs between DC and SN nodes?
Just relax brother, you are getting too uptight about what others are choosing to do.
Where @DarthCoin preaches about how he lives on the bitcoin standard but where he in reality refuses to engage with and participate in SNs BTC enabled circular economy I will point out this fucking massive HYPOCRISY.
Note also you do not have any BTC payments wallet attached.
Only one for receiving sats from others who have enabled their LN/BTC sending wallets.
Another arsemilking parasite?
The real and broader problem, danger and consequence beyond @Darthcoins own hypocrisy is that @DarthCoin has considerable status here on SNs and many appear to be following his example and ditching the use of BTC wallets thus undermining the growth of and strength of this BTC circular economy.
I will fight for BTC circular economies as they are essential to BTC/LN MoE development, liquidity, capacity and strength and I will point out 'BTC maxi' hypocrits who undermine them.
Ah, so everyone who lives on a Bitcoin standard must tip in sats to other players on SN. Must have missed that chapter in Saifedean Ammous‘s book.
You keep saying hypocrisy. Hypocrisy would be if DC worked for a central bank. Or wrote Keynesian literature. Choosing to not configure a setting on a centralized website is nonsense, not hypocrisy! Who cares!
Why do you care what one player does with their sats? You keep summoning him too. Why you so itching for a fight bro. Let’s all live in orange peace.
If you loudly claim here on SNs to have ditched fiat and to be living entirely on The BTC Standard and then I see you deliberately refusing to attach your BTC/LN wallets here on SNs, I will call you a hypocrit...because you are.
SNs is one of the very few global communities and markets where we can engage and participate in a true BTC/LN circular economy. If you choose to boycott that your claims to be a BTC Maxi are highly suspect...and I will point that out- tirelessly!
If you only enable a receiving wallet then you look like an arsemilking parasite.
@DarthCoin has openly admitted he does not want to 'waste' any of his precious sats on SNs by enabling BTC/LN payments and so I call hypocrit and parasite.
I am empathetic to the ‘do not waste’ Sats arguments. While
I like zapping posts, very few are truly worth the eternal cost. Free Text is of negligible value in the age of inference.
Maybe “real” Sats are just more precious to me, and DC. If you are happy to MoE me a few million sats I would be happy to circulate them throughout the economy:
bc1qnp82um34cptx7qr6lk7rk0r5eep0vj7vdkqsz3
I’m happy to bounce CCs. It achieves the same and supports this centralized site.
You can call us both parasites for being “in only” on SN, but it is not hypocritical. I like to think that myself and others like DC who choose “in only” are adding value in other ways.
There is also the security risk of attaching a wallet. I don’t like delegating control of keys to 3rd parties. Which is what attaching an outgoing payment API is doing.
Please don’t criticize my security model, or the choices I make with what I do with my earned sats. It’s not your place to do this.
hello @DarthCoin sockpuppet.
Depends of the use case and wallet used. I use multiple wallet apps with multiple wallet keys. All spread on the 3 levels pattern: