pull down to refresh

Ah, yeah it's definitely a permissions thing then. As always, security requires inconveniences. I wouldn't mind SN just going back to custodial wallets. We can't get a de minimis exemption to bitcoin transactions soon enough.

63 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 10h

I don't know. I really love the idea of attached wallets here. We are genuinely using the lightning network, IMO, though I know people disagree with me. Going back to custodial wallets would be disappointing.

reply

IMO at the amounts and the transaction rates we're dealing with, it really just makes more sense. People would still be using lightning to deposit and withdraw real sats to their SN account.

reply

The amounts are small, but trustlessness should count for something, no?

reply