pull down to refresh
That raises another question though about how legitimacy is determined. I was convinced that he didn't win the election too, but he did secure power and claimed to have done so legitimately.
It seems like, if that's what makes this valid, then they'd have to demonstrate first that he did not actually win the election. Otherwise, why not just make that claim about anyone?
reply
reply
Interesting, I missed that story.
reply
Here ya go! Whatever we learned it makes you wonder
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/27/hugo-carvajal-venezuela-pleads-guilty-drug-charges
reply
However there is a stark difference in one being a legitimate leader and one who isnt. That kinda the line I point at. If Maduro was a legitimate leader than this is an entirely different thing.