pull down to refresh
hahaha you still believe that crap reason of "registered business at risk for using sats"?
Cmon maaan... you are too gullible for that crap. Nobody gives a shit about SN using sats for shitposting
And BTW... the MTL do not apply to Bitcoin, only to fiat and banks.
allow only custodial solutions to be attached?
I didn't say that. I said the opposite.
Me? ahaha, no thanks. But probably k00b (or his investors, lawyers, or accountants) do. Otherwise, what other reason could justify CCs? Just the introduction of gamification?
Has been discussed here somewhere, can't find the post now
I will repeat: CCs are good for SN. Yes, SN is a game and needs an "in-game currency". And paying those credits with sats only is perfectly fine. But most of people still do not understand this game.
SN in order to survive and later thrive must...
In a Bitcoin world EVERYTHING is a "must pay" service and not assmilk.
And that's why I always said:
but very few people really understand or pay attention to my words.
Even Car and ek are considering me "the enemy of SN", when in fact is exactly the opposite and all my critics are for a good thing, because I can see far more than many others how a "bitcoin world" will look like.
I look forward to see what will happen this year. Paying (whatever currency) for value is human unconscious behavior anyway.
Yes, definitely, but SN as registered business was at risk. That's why CCs came. Should then SN just sell CCs for sats, remove rewards, and allow only custodial solutions to be attached? What else from your CC-maxi perspective should be done to bring back the initial SN bitcoin-only flavor?