pull down to refresh

1 sat \ 34 replies \ @dathon_ohm 6 Jan \ parent \ on: Dathon Ohm releases BIP 110 release candidate 2 bitcoin

A 55% threshold will not cause disruption. Everyone will have plenty of time to upgrade.

write
preview
103 sats \ 20 replies \ @Murch 6 Jan

You do know that just repeating this claim like a mantra doesn’t actually make it so, right?

reply
101 sats \ 19 replies \ @dathon_ohm 7 Jan

If someone can argue coherently as to why it's wrong, I will change my mind. I have only heard incoherent FUD up until now.

reply
103 sats \ 18 replies \ @optimism 7 Jan

Incoherent FUD like this proposed guide?

reply
1 sat \ 17 replies \ @dathon_ohm 7 Jan -21 sats

Social consensus is overwhelmingly in favor of rejecting data storage as a use case, and BIP-110 is the best way to accomplish this. If someone finds a better way, I will withdraw BIP-110. Failing that, there is absolutely no reason to oppose BIP-110.

332 sats \ 11 replies \ @Scoresby OP 6 Jan

If 2016 blocks is plenty of time to upgrade, why not just have BIP 110 activate 2016 blocks from now?

reply
1 sat \ 10 replies \ @dathon_ohm 7 Jan -21 sats

You cannot be serious.

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @optimism 6 Jan

@remindme in 265 days

reply