pull down to refresh

A saint said "Let the perfect city rise.
Here needs no long debate on subtleties,
Means, end,
Let us intend
That all be clothed and fed; while one remains
Hungry our quarreling but mocks his pains.
So all will labor to the good
In one phalanx of brotherhood."
A man cried out "I know the truth, I, I,
Perfect and whole. He who denies
My vision is a madman or a fool
Or seeks some base advantage in his lies.
All peoples are a tool that fits my hand
Cutting you each and all
Into my plan."
They were one man.

Yesterday I learned that neither @Undisciplined nor I have read this book when I had asked whether it might be good one for the ~econ hobbyist.

The book caught my attention because -- being muser I am -- I was dawdling before work one day reading some of the author's poetry. Cool, a real renaissance man, thought I! (The above poem was reprodiced from Part 1.)

So a book club was suggested, to which I had to give some thought. Book clubs are hard to coordinate digitally and assigning deadlines, guidelines etc. are just ... well, not very Libertarian, maybe.

but what are others saying about the book?

The reviews on goodreads exhibit about exactly as much divisiveness as I usually look for ....

I'm a generally a minarchist... but support local tyrannies in some cases. Ultimately, I'm a utilitarian. I'm a pussy compared to Friedman.

And

The main body of the book itself is predictably well-executed but will probably leave most libertarians nodding their heads and everybody else scratching theirs – in 160 pages Friedman discusses all the classic ways in which private property and absence of coercion can lead to a well-functioning society that requires little state (Part II) or no state (Part III). Part II is perfectly reasonable and almost practical, part III is a theoretical pipe dream, logically consistent but almost surely impractical

&

The Machinery of Freedom is a comparatively easy and short read, compared to the other libertarian manifestos, and so especially recommendable to beginners.

. . . Are a few that stuck out.

so what the Book Club?

Well, there won't be one, sadly. But as alternative, i shall do something else -- a book non-club.

Periodically (hereby am not committing to any regularity) i shall post reflections from my reading.

Anyone else is welcome to participate by:

  • reading along
  • commenting, inquisitively
  • posting their own reflections

Every part has a poem included at the beginning. These, I'll also try to engage with.

So here goes. Part 1 loading .....

Periodically (hereby am not committing to any regularity) i shall post reflections from my reading.
Anyone else is welcome to participate

That's 100% how I've been treating the SN book clubs

reply

Looking forward to not being in this club, right alongside you

reply

I'm glad for it. I hope others agree to not join in.

reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 23h
Periodically (hereby am not committing to any regularity) i shall post reflections from my reading.
Anyone else is welcome to participate by:
reading along
commenting, inquisitively
posting their own reflections

Insightful. Online book clubs sound great until you try to implement one. A few have been tried here, with limited success. @elvismercury had the most success, but he did ninety percent of the heavy lifting. I like your idea.

reply

I fully expect that to happen, so instead of trying to coerce, bribe or cajole others, i'll simply let it happen.

reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @Signal312 23h

Does the book have practical guidelines as well, or is it more theory?

reply

from the intro:

The purpose of this book is to persuade you that a libertarian society would be both free and attractive, that the institutions of private property are the machinery of freedom, making it possible, in a complicated and interdependent world, for each person to pursue his life as he sees fit.

What I gather is it is more practical from a governance standpoint, less the individual

reply

Posting your reflections online is a great way to hold yourself accountable for your reading xP

reply

Do Libertarians assume the security of the group from outside influences?
How can a community thrive if it is not secure from outside influence.
My problem with Libertarian ideology is that it seems to take for granted the security of human groups when the reality of history suggests that achieving true security/sovereignty for any group of humans (or individual) is nigh on impossible without significant development of collective defensive resources...and that the most powerful groups are inevitably the ones most able to project their power upon other groups.
The wealth of nations is thus highly dependent upon the proficiency and power projection capability of their governments.

reply

Love the approach of a ‘book non-club.’ makes reading and reflecting feel personal and exploratory not forced.That poem at the start already sets a really thought provoking tone excited to see your take on Part 1.”

reply