Scott Adams, the creator of the Dilbert comic series and outspoken conservative commentator, has died at the age of 68 following a battle with prostate cancer. His ex-wife announced his death on Tuesday during an episode of his Coffee with Scott Adams livestream.
Also here:
RIP was certainly familiar with Dilbert and I became aware of his other work through Naval Ravikant talking about his work. Never followed him that closely but since he announced he had stage 4 cancer I have been fascinated with his journey to end of life. All the things he was trying and then his last minute Pascal's wager.
For any Christians on the site: is that good enough to get him into heaven?
There is a lot of gatekeeping in christianity. One of the reasons I tend to not be a fan of organized religion. Although I do think there are some positives. Faith should be on one's own terms.
My wife is fairly religious and takes the kids to church every week. I don't go. We have come to an agreement on how the kids will be raised as relates to religion/faith.
Last time I went to church was my daughter's first communion last year and I left extremely annoyed at having to listen to the priest lecture little kids for an hour about how they must put Jesus first in their lives and they have to coerce their parents to take them to church.
So this is a long winded way of saying there should be no rules as to whether you jumped through the appropriate hoops to get into heaven. I don't think God is sitting around thinking "nah you didn't believe hard enough, to hell with you". I think faith and trying to be a good person is more important than jumping through arbitrary hoops created by the church. But that is just my own opinion.
It has always seemed like a very small god that would do a thing like that, but some people are very literalist, and it's interesting to hear how they construe the situation.
Kinda a lot like bitcoiners.
Hoop jumping has always been the enemy.
Purity tests are a big part of political ideology these days too.
It's such a great question!
Here's the relevant bit that is attributed to him:
Did he mean it? He was dying, he knew he was dying, so he probably had more reason to mean in than the rest of us, but like how do you measure sincerity of something like that?
I don't know how good a representation of Christian I am (in the past at least I was quite serious about faith, almost became a Franciscan novitiate...), but I kind of connect this sort of thinking to the idea of forgiveness in general.
If there is such a thing as a sin, and it takes you away from God, and God offers a way back which entails you acknowledging that you sinned and feeling some sense of remorse or not wanting to do it again, then all that is required is wanting to be closer to God. Of course, "wanting to be closer to God" isn't exactly a recipe.
I was wondering similar thoughts to you when I read Adams last note there. My wonder was more along the lines of why did he need to tell the world about it? For me, at least, it cheapens it a little, but maybe others feel it is a "powerful witness."
Maybe it just comes down to being scared of death and nothing afterward, and wanting there to be more. In my book that might be enough if enough is relevant.
Thanks for the thoughtful response.
This is getting close to it for me. I think a person can legitimately want to believe something that they don't in fact believe; or want to want something that they don't in fact want. Like, a meta-desire for religion, even though they can't, in truth, claim to believe the religious tenets.
This always seemed quite the metaphysical pickle. Adams seems like an example of it -- scared, probably desperate to believe, but unable to, but willing to make the Hail Mary (no pun intended), just in case. I've wondered for years whether a thing like this can "count", and I know people don't like that phrasing, but to me it's the most honest phrasing that describes a significant swathe of humans on this planet, and is therefore worth tackling directly.
The question isn't whether any action he did or didn't take was good enough to get him into heaven. By that metric we'd all fail. The more important question is whether he trusts that Jesus's death and resurrection are sufficient for his justification before God.
That question reminds me of the way Trump talks about getting into heaven.
it's a natural human instinct to think in terms of quid pro quo and earning our way into heaven
Totally. I am annoyed on many levels the way people talk about Trump in relationship to his eternal soul. Clearly he's lost in both senses. People use him for their own ends and he does the same. Sad in many ways.
If you think he is a Christian and are aware of the way he communicates about such things I would hope you are praying that someone close to him would speak to him about it. If you are a Christian and understand that people are communicating that Trump is also a Christian should you also be concerned that this is leading people astray from the grace of God and work of Jesus taught by all Christian traditions for 2000 years?
For those that might misunderstand. I'm not pretending I know the heart or life of Trump or anyone else. I pray that he has put his faith in Jesus and that he is on a path to following Jesus and that all the things I have heard him say are just from ignorance. I take no glee in anyone being outside of the family of God. But it is important for Christians to be clear about such things.
So the heart of it is his actual trust and belief? And if a person does not have that belief, then actions like his (paraphrasing) "I don't really think this is true, but I hope it is" aren't sufficient?
This seems consequential, since a person doesn't have much control over what she believes or doesn't; but she does have some control over what she does. A person can sign up for something by force of will, but not believe in something by force of will, using the usual definition of "will".
I've never been clear on what "counts" wrt Christian salvation.
Long Live Dilbert.
his ex-wife reading his last words
view on x.comhttps://twiiit.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/2011091094113828959
Ah man, RIP.
Sad day
I loved Adam's work. Calling him a conservative commentator is wild. Crazy how much has changed in the world. What is considered conservative and liberal these days makes little-to-no sense.
User Interface for Reality
https://blossom.primal.net/a781bee7fcdb6435269f59301752d594d0322bd352b2c6d4526e2db30913fb3e.mp4
https://twiiit.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/2011098669169459623