pull down to refresh
I don't mind if someone says "it's easy to get 50%"
In that case, it is something measurable and either they will or they won't.
But I'm mystified by these statements which assume some knowledge that I apparently have great difficulty accessing but also imply certitude that things will go a certain way.
If less than 50% of hashrate does not run BIP110, I fail to see how that changes. Every block that gets found in such a state will require the majority of hashrate to sacrifice even more in order to "comply" with BIP110 chain.
I really don't understand what I'm missing.
It's all bullshit. Luke is speaking to his base, not to you.
If there is a chaintip split and you're on the not-forked side, you can still replay all txns on the other side and get the fees, including those that you didn't mine. The only thing you cannot get is the fees from utxo that were doublespent.
Is it bad of me to occasionally write the acronym for this fork as RTRDS?
YES!!! Shame on you! 😠lol
Naw... but I dont know what the fuck that means and why we all can't just get along.
Worse. I don't understand why there is a toxic conversation between the author of said BIP and Murch while I spent 7 fucking hours trying to be nice and bring actual issues to the table.
If it is that easy to get 50%, then why does Ocean not have 50%?