pull down to refresh
what about the eventuality where a nonBIP110 miner mines a block that includes a tx that is banned by BIP110?
Doesn't this cause a split?
If the majority of hashrate is not running BIP110, won't we see a BIP110 chain that forks off the nonBIP110 chain?
If hashrate does not go over to BIP110, why would you expect any reorg?
it's easy to say that you don't want to lose your block rewards. that's what BIP110 is banking on. but what if the BIP100 miners have a dip in hash rate and two blocks are mined that aren't BIP100 compliant? are BIP100 miners going to work at a two block deficit, hoping that they catch up? or are they just going to "start over from here"?
this can go on forever, and the fees on those non BIP100 transactions are going to start getting real fat. what if someone puts two non BIP100 transactions that can't be mined in the same block, each with a 1BTC reward? think that line will hold?
hah
BIP110 is never "activated", because it doesn't provide anything that the other miners won't accept. the "BIP110 chain" is also the regular chain. you'll just get more re-orgs