pull down to refresh

it's easy to say that you don't want to lose your block rewards. that's what BIP110 is banking on. but what if the BIP100 miners have a dip in hash rate and two blocks are mined that aren't BIP100 compliant? are BIP100 miners going to work at a two block deficit, hoping that they catch up? or are they just going to "start over from here"?

this can go on forever, and the fees on those non BIP100 transactions are going to start getting real fat. what if someone puts two non BIP100 transactions that can't be mined in the same block, each with a 1BTC reward? think that line will hold?

hah

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Murch 3h

RDTS node runners can’t change the activation mechanism in their software without recompiling, so no, they can’t decide to accept a few invalid blocks after activation to start over at a higher height.

reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ynniv 2h

a voluntary censorship fork ... weird flex but okay 🤷🏻‍♂️

reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Murch 2h

Having a hard time making sense of your reply.

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ynniv 2h

what's the benefit of running BIP110?

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Murch 2h

If you think I was arguing for RDTS, you misunderstood me.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ynniv 2h

deleted by author