pull down to refresh

361 sats \ 33 replies \ @dathon_ohm 28 Jan \ parent \ on: dathonohm releases BIP 110/RDTS activation client v0.1 bitcoin

BIP-110 is much closer to Segwit than to BCH, given that Segwit was a softfork, while BCH was a hardfork.

write
preview
1 sat \ 32 replies \ @Filiprogrammer 28 Jan

True.
And also BCH enabled much bigger blocks, which hurts decentralization. Meanwhile BIP-110 aims to do the opposite by reducing block bloat caused by inscriptions.
So the comparison to BCH makes no sense.

reply
1 sat \ 31 replies \ @028559d218 30 Jan -21 sats

Blocks aren't bloated due to inscriptions... maybe the UTXO set is, but not blocks themselves. Blocks are the same size.

And UTXO set bloat can and does occur with 10 byte op_returns (with bip-110 doesn't fix) so imo bip-110 changes nothing.