It would be great to get someone smart to explain the difference or why specifically Floresta is good? I see some excitement around it, but I also have no knowledge in this space.
So, as I understand, Floresta uses a "utreexo" to where all the utxo's get bashed down into tiny small set. That tiny utreexo contains all the utxo's. Sounds good to me.
This reminds me of the Mina protocol which I always thought had an interesting way of doing things, albeit I found hard to wrap my mind around and hard to work with.
It would be great to get someone smart to explain the difference or why specifically Floresta is good? I see some excitement around it, but I also have no knowledge in this space.
it's good because utreexo is good.
it solves mempool spam issue, makes the op return wars irrelevant, and basically solves scaling for bitcoin.
https://medium.com/@kcalvinalvinn/eli5-utreexo-a-scaling-solution-9531aee3d7ba
waiting devs working on it making possible a LN node powered by Floresta.
So, as I understand, Floresta uses a "utreexo" to where all the utxo's get bashed down into tiny small set. That tiny utreexo contains all the utxo's. Sounds good to me.
This reminds me of the Mina protocol which I always thought had an interesting way of doing things, albeit I found hard to wrap my mind around and hard to work with.
@DarthCoin
You still cannot be bother attaching a LN wallet to Stacker News.
Many are following your example boycotting use of the LN here on SNs.
Do you feel proud of being such a blatant hypocrit and promoting the debasement of the SNs BTC LN V4V circular economy?
Uses libbitcoinkernel
Very cool! How does it compare to neutrino? I see the approach is completely different but would appreciate some highlights.