pull down to refresh
Fair enough to suspend judgment for a bit. This is like the ordinals debate a bit, in the sense that abusers should eventually run out of money... right?
But just to push back a bit on the concept of "Fighting sats with sats". That still requires us to know the existence of a post in the first place, which we may not if we have a sats filter up. Unless you mean that the poster needs to fight their adversary with their own sats.
abusers should eventually run out of money... right?
Not a fair comparison imo. The have little in common other than someone is spending money to do something we don't like. There's little expectation of financial payoff for downzapping in this case. Once a jpeg is in a block, it's in the block forever. Individual network participants lack unilateral recourse if a miner includes it in a block.
Anyway, perhaps all this is reason enough to implement blocking features to prevent consistent butts from seeing your posts/comments.
Or, they could just attach a spending wallet.
Is that too much to ask of a dedicated Bitcoiner who has earned 1.7 millions sats here on SNs?
Or as koob indicates, just subscribe to den.
I can assure you, the CCP funds me more than adequately.
I'm suspending judgement for bit a la negative capability. I want to avoid reacting to "abuse" when the results haven't come in yet.
On the abuse, I found myself tempted to fight sats with sats. Perhaps that is as it should be.