With the new sat filters release from k00b
#1428221
I want to tweak mine but I'm not really sure what I'm doing, and I'm not sure I fully understand where to set them
and I was wondering what everyone else is setting theirs at?
0 - I want to see everything no filter87.5%
1-10 - see most posts0.0%
11-50 - filter out spam0.0%
51-200 - higher quality posts0.0%
201-500 - only solid performers0.0%
501+ - elite tier posts0.0%
Other please specify12.5%
8 votes \ 1 day left
Bring it on
Send it 🚀
<0if you like seeing stuff other people paid to reduce the visibility of=0if you want to see free stuff=1for comments and=10for posts if you want to see nearly everything but free stuff and heavily downzapped stuff>1for comments and>50for posts to mostly see stuff people have paid to increase the visibility of@k00b I wonder if we can still have Wild West mode to just see everything
@jakoyoh629 brought up a good point that anyone can completely snipe a post out of existence now by downzapping it 1,000 sats plus posting fee
Yeah someone is pounding den's posts. I'll add a
-infinity.Maybe if we mute someone too, their downzaps shouldn't factor into our visibility
Ugh, this is getting too complicated. Social signaling and trust is difficult game theory
There's something about sat filters that feels very
naturalto me.Some people will be unfairly targeted with downzap campaigns, which is only natural, and folks who are consistent butts will be fairly targeted with even more downzap campaigns, which is also oh so wonderfully natural.
But we won't know who's targeting others with downzapping campaigns
it's also not very robust to people who "just want to watch the world burn"
I definitely would consider it a value loss if I didn't see @denlillaapan posts because someone had a hard-on for targeting him
(I think it's probably @Solomonsatoshi, since he's been harping on people without connected wallets)
someone has it in for me?! who could that possibly me, I'm so nice
You use two different names so you're obviously a double agent
I'm suspending judgement for bit a la negative capability. I want to avoid reacting to "abuse" when the results haven't come in yet.
On the abuse, I found myself tempted to fight sats with sats. Perhaps that is as it should be.
Fair enough to suspend judgment for a bit. This is like the ordinals debate a bit, in the sense that abusers should eventually run out of money... right?
But just to push back a bit on the concept of "Fighting sats with sats". That still requires us to know the existence of a post in the first place, which we may not if we have a sats filter up. Unless you mean that the poster needs to fight their adversary with their own sats.
Correct.
Free market forces.
V4V.
Put your sats where you values are.
@denlillaapan is not wanting to attach a spending wallet and participate in the V4V sats denominated circular economy in a reciprocal manner.
I do not 'want to watch the world burn' - I want it denominated in sats, P2P, V4V and that might start by eliminating hypocrisy from self described 'Bitcoiners' who refuse to use the LN here on SNs?
Mine are at -1000.
I want to see everything.
I haven't changed mine from whatever they made the default. It looks like that's 1 sat.
Is this a benchmark for core knots
def!
nothing yet, don't understand this (yet? ever?)
I see your comment, looks like the boys are discussing stuff
Foof filters...
https://m.stacker.news/129358