pull down to refresh
There's something about sat filters that feels very natural to me.
Some people will be unfairly targeted with downzap campaigns, which is only natural, and folks who are consistent butts will be fairly targeted with even more downzap campaigns, which is also oh so wonderfully natural.
But we won't know who's targeting others with downzapping campaigns
it's also not very robust to people who "just want to watch the world burn"
I definitely would consider it a value loss if I didn't see @denlillaapan posts because someone had a hard-on for targeting him
(I think it's probably @Solomonsatoshi, since he's been harping on people without connected wallets)
someone has it in for me?! who could that possibly me, I'm so nice
I'm suspending judgement for bit a la negative capability. I want to avoid reacting to "abuse" when the results haven't come in yet.
On the abuse, I found myself tempted to fight sats with sats. Perhaps that is as it should be.
Fair enough to suspend judgment for a bit. This is like the ordinals debate a bit, in the sense that abusers should eventually run out of money... right?
But just to push back a bit on the concept of "Fighting sats with sats". That still requires us to know the existence of a post in the first place, which we may not if we have a sats filter up. Unless you mean that the poster needs to fight their adversary with their own sats.
abusers should eventually run out of money... right?
Not a fair comparison imo. The have little in common other than someone is spending money to do something we don't like. There's little expectation of financial payoff for downzapping in this case. Once a jpeg is in a block, it's in the block forever. Individual network participants lack unilateral recourse if a miner includes it in a block.
Anyway, perhaps all this is reason enough to implement blocking features to prevent consistent butts from seeing your posts/comments.
Or, they could just attach a spending wallet.
Is that too much to ask of a dedicated Bitcoiner who has earned 1.7 millions sats here on SNs?
Or as koob indicates, just subscribe to den.
I can assure you, the CCP funds me more than adequately.Correct.
Free market forces.
V4V.
Put your sats where you values are.
@denlillaapan is not wanting to attach a spending wallet and participate in the V4V sats denominated circular economy in a reciprocal manner.
I do not 'want to watch the world burn' - I want it denominated in sats, P2P, V4V and that might start by eliminating hypocrisy from self described 'Bitcoiners' who refuse to use the LN here on SNs?
Maybe if we mute someone too, their downzaps shouldn't factor into our visibility
Ugh, this is getting too complicated. Social signaling and trust is difficult game theory