pull down to refresh

Self proclaimed 'Libertarian living on the Bitcoin Standard' @DarthCoin demands payment for the alleged 'inconvenience' of using LN on SNs.

He claims using LN would stress his nodes and that CC shitcoins are more reliable anyway.
Sounds like a fiat bankers statist apologist!

Is there any limit to @DarthCoins stupidity and hypocrisy? It seems not.

He is seeking such an arrangement via contract that is enforceable under what jurisdiction exactly? US law? NZ law?

What nation state judicial authorities is @DarthCoins proposed contract enforceable under?

A contract that is not enforceable is a nonsense and a joke- just like @DarthCoin and his demonstrably untrue claims to be 'living on the bitcoin standard' and all his other hollow man Big Talk No Walk, posturing bullshit.

@DarthCoin looks and acts a lot like an NSA mole sent to infiltrate- posturing as a rebel freedom fighter while gathering intelligence on Bitcoin systems and participants.

Either that or hes just a complete tosspot loser.

Nobody knows who @DarthCoin really is, except his sock puppets.

Even if I did agree to his absurd, unenforceable and inherently invalid 'contract', he has no attached receiving wallet to which sats could be sent!