Using money as a moderator is a fundamental part of the V4V model so not sure how you see that as refuting anything in my above statement...because it doesn't.
Using money as a way to reduce spam and encourage good content is central to the V4V model.
In the case of SNs the idea was to use BTC/sats as the money but then some meddling cunts from the nation state decided to put pressure on the SNs operators on the pretext of money transmission and they were forced to compromise by introducing CC shitcoins for any participants not able to attach a LN wallet.
CCs degrade and undermine the sats denominated nature of the SNs economy but you insist on using them despite claiming to 'live on The Bitcoin Standard'.
Its almost as if there is a state surveillance mole operating and infiltrating SNs and seeking to undermine its project @DarthCoin
What a nasty deceitful cunt that mole would, be I'm sure you will agree.