pull down to refresh

if I'm a troll, I will create 100 sock puppets to downzap 10 sats each.

Now though, one account is enough. Haha.

I get what you're saying though: the log10() doesn't help against megatrolls and can be gamed, exactly like now.

With the down limits, I just upzap my puppet on my territory and with 9% loss I downzap away. Costs 50k a month to do that.

112 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b 20 Feb

If I'm the average troll, I'd guess I'm less likely to buy a territory than set up sock puppets. But yeah, not a silver bullet by any stretch.

reply
196 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b 20 Feb

Other random ideas:

  • add the ability to block accounts (hiding your content from trolls)
  • as an alternative to blocks: if you downzap someone beyond X sats, you are forced to mute them with some cool down period
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fenix 22 Feb

1 - mute is enough and now @ek come with a cool script

2 - This is cool

reply

Make this experiment for a month: you can downzap ONLY with CCs.
hahahaha SS will cry for my zaps with CC

reply

LMAO

Darth always come up with the most assholish solutions

reply
reply

Block will be abused like this:

post(k00b is a dick) && block(k00b)

Then you make k00b2 and I rinse and repeat.

I think that, and forced mute, will probably make it into a Sybil war more than prevent one

reply