Cosmos

 We demonstrate that Billy and Bob possess fundamentally distinct topological relationships to complexity, formalized through differential genus structures (M₂ vs M₃).

Because their handle architectures differ, the same monetary operators—exsanctance (ℰ) and deliberism (𝒟)—produce asymmetric effects during Quantitative Easing (QE) and Quantitative Tightening (QT) phases.

Billy (genus-2) experiences QE as immediate relief (50% handle increase) and QT as acute stress (2-handle bottleneck).

Bob (genus-3) experiences QE as diluted benefit (33% handle increase) and QT as manageable constraint (3-handle diffusion).

The QE Impact Ratio (Billy:Bob) = 3:2; the QT Stress Ratio = 3:2; net asymmetry = 1.5× volatility for Billy. Universal monetary policy assumes homogeneous genus; real populations exhibit systematic heterogeneity, creating empathy failures.

Policy implications: differential QE (β<1 for Billy, γ>1 for Bob) and graduated QT (δ<1 for Billy, ε>1 for Bob) can achieve equal subjective relief with less aggregate injection.

The Principle of Individualization demands that policy design account for genus heterogeneity.