pull down to refresh

63 sats \ 11 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Apr \ parent \ on: Draymond on tanking "FIAT FINES" Stacker_Sports

Better, no more splitting game revenue between teams, only the winners get paid.

write
compose
67 sats \ 10 replies \ @grayruby 9 Apr

Players too.

reply
42 sats \ 9 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Apr

Nope. Winners take all, including TV revenue.

reply
104 sats \ 1 reply \ @unboiled 9 Apr

Gotta give the losers something. Maybe a small trophy for being there? Like, for participating?

reply
23 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Apr

Losers get the most valuable gift of all, a reality check.

reply
57 sats \ 6 replies \ @grayruby 9 Apr

Wow the games would be so good.

reply
42 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Apr

Right?

reply
91 sats \ 4 replies \ @gsc360 OP 9 Apr

Draymond idea on steroids

reply
69 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby 9 Apr

I feel like Draymond may get arrested for murder in this format.

reply
42 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Apr

Imagine Draymond vs Beef Stew at the end of a close nationally televised game

reply
85 sats \ 1 reply \ @gsc360 OP 9 Apr

Aí veredict - commie issues

Technically possible but politically and legally fraught; a winner-weighted split can reduce tanking only if carefully balanced with protections for small markets and negotiated with the players’ union. Prefer incremental pilots or draft-lottery reforms that lower tanking incentives without upending league parity or inviting litigation.

view all 1 replies