The attention economy isn’t just stealing our focus; it’s reshaping our reality. Drawing on Simone Weil, philosopher Kathryn Lawson argues that social media algorithms don’t just distract us but commit a deeper form of violence, reshaping our minds and stripping away genuine human connection. Each scroll surrenders our thinking to machines designed solely to keep us engaged, replacing what Weil saw as true attention—essential for ethics and truth—with a hollow substitute. Now, as a California jury holds Meta and Google liable for fuelling a young woman’s childhood addiction to their platforms, the solution isn't simply logging off, but relearning how to genuinely attend to others and reclaim our mental autonomy.
pull down to refresh
related posts
I don't even remember what I scrolled over 10 minutes ago, unless a new trigger reminds me of it. Yet, I remember vividly what I talked about with my colleague during lunch.
Ersatz attention vs true attention, clearly.
ersetzen. Formed of "er" (re) "setzen" (place) in Middle High German (originated 1050 - 1350)
For example, yesterday I took a replacement bus service because the metro didn't run. It's called Schienenersatzverkehr: Rail replacement transport.
Trying to invent concepts because you can say some
bulshyttabout the second war to make yourself sound important and authoritative, is kind of funny business to me. It would be rather Gell-Mann of me if I were to believe that the other claims in the article were not as inelegantly misstated just to make it sound right.All this leads me to a question: does society actually lose anything from AI slop if human slop is at least as prevalent?