reply on: Where should JoinMarket development focus next? \ stacker news

pull down to refresh

you are comparing ln costs to on chain costs
two different worlds

Exactly. Ones are proportional to the transaction amount and the others are fixed. Those lines intersect.

you will pay coinjoin on chain costs and then open a channel, on chain also, to make a ln transaction
please make it make sense

Not necessarily. The case of buying p2p and sending to cold storage is a very common example.

you know there are also zero fee channels, but it's inconvenient to mention

The things you say make me think you don't know what you're talking about.

Your tone makes me think you are not eager to learn either.

I learned enough that I don't coinjoin, mix or whatever other unnecessary privacy theater there is

ah yes, moneroos, a special kind of retarded

Might be a good decision for your case and threat model. Doesn't mean it's the only "correct" way for all other cases.

You would do yourself a favor if you read Darths linked guides, do some practicing and stitching 2 and 2 together.

I can buy Bitcoin however I want and after one transaction no one can link anything anymore

you don't know what you're talking about.

just by mentioning the 0 fee channels and he demonstrate that he knows more than you...