pull down to refresh

Magnet links usually have a tracker embedded (because DHT blows ass)

Unless you're stripping those out or disabling trackers in your client I assure you that you're using trackers and not DHT most if not all of the time.

I have used bittorrent to share files with friends. Manually created torrent. No trackers. Works. What client are you using?

reply

Over the years pretty much all of them, ktorrent master race though

It's not just a me thing, trackers are still used by the ecosystem exactly because the T in DHT stands for trash

reply

What kind of troubles have you had with DHT? I just tested it with a completely new torrent and a magnet link (and yes, no trackers) and my friend downloaded it successfully. Single seeder on the planet (me) found by a single leacher on the planet (my friend).

reply

Anecdotal working tests doesn't make it performant or reliable, that's literally the meme

A torrent without a tracker will often just stall and never start pulling chunks, this is why trackers are still used 20+ years after torrents introduced DHT... to the extent they are used is largely as a backup to trackers which themselves can go down or be overloaded... it's not reliable enough to be the primary source unless the torrent has a large swarm.

If a torrent has a webseed, DHT probably would be adequate, but that's effectively replacing the tracker by having static peers to serve the first chunks directly

reply

with all this effor that you put in this thread you would just open a PR and add your shit so we could move on

reply

Jeasus christ 🤦‍♂️

reply

Funny how it’s always 0 or 100 when it comes to DHT, as in I’m yet to see someone say it’s just mid or ok.

Same goes for IPFS, which is funny because they claim to have solved all of the issues from DHT.

reply

If DHT is 0 IPFS is a negative int

Played with that early on in the shock journey and it was an absolute disaster

reply
23 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 4 Jun

HashTrash haha

reply

Distributed* hash trash

Makes it sound cooler

reply